🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume nuclear talks with Washington on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations produced results, and shared recent overtures had originated from go-betweens to resume negotiations with the Trump administration. He said Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Path

The foreign minister is navigating a complex course since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a situation of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged stronger in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Talks Suddenly Ended

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that ended with Donald Trump asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries exercised their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Status

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in some form if discussions resume.

The US president last week stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives state they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Position

In his remarks to the conference, designed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the 12-day war demonstrated the dispute could not be ended by combat operations. He asserted the strikes commenced with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were executed with complete American awareness and coordination, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Final Solution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had always sought to dictate their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and continues the ultimate solution to settle disagreements, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the approach of respect and respect, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent tone."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We acquired many lessons from this conflict; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He added: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to obliterate, stays intact. The facilities and machinery, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the will of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this assault."